AI test automation that writes, runs and repairs every test.
ZeuZ Test Studio is an AI test automation tool for QA leads done rewriting selectors and triaging flaky failures. It's time to bring automated QA up to the speed of AI generated code.
per release cycle
per release cycle
on AI spend
ZeuZ hands all six testing steps back to your roadmap.
Most automated testing tools automate step 04, execution, and leave the other five to people.
- 01Test design
Today: Coverage gets decided by whoever has been on the team longest.
In Test Studio: Point it at your requirements; it proposes the coverage and you cut what you don't want.
regression_plan_FINAL_v7.xlsxlast edited 5 months agoTestOwnerLast runKeep?Checkout happy pathPriyaMar 12yesLoyalty discount?never??Stage totals recalcTomaszJan 30ask AlexContact merge historyleft the company—?"Do we still need row 14?" · comment from 6 weeks ago, no reply - 02Test case creation
Today: Written manually, in a ticket, after the code is already done.
In Test Studio: Type the behaviour in plain English and Test Studio writes the case.
PROJ-118 · Loyalty discount at checkoutqa-todoSteps to test (added after merge):1. Log in as the test user2. Add an item over $50 to the cart3. Apply code SPRING-24 at checkout4. Expect 10% off the subtotal"someone please verify before Friday" · assigned: unassigned - 03Test automation
Today: You script it; web, mobile, desktop and API, each on its own.
In Test Studio: It compiles to executable automation and you never open a selector file.
checkout_spec.py · unsaved changesdriver.find_element(By.CSS_SELECTOR,"#btn-apply-2.css-19x8hz")# NoSuchElementException (again)# TODO: re-inspect after deploy# TODO: same fix in cart_spec, order_spec… - 04Test execution
Today: Parallel regression on every merge, triggered from your CI/CD.
In Test Studio: Unchanged, the one step the market already fixed.
ci · run #4812 · mainpassed$ pytest tests/ --parallel 8collecting 21 tests…21 passed in 6m 12striggered by merge 3f9e2a1 · already automated, this one works - 05Reporting and analysis
Today: You read the red and decide which reds are real.
In Test Studio: Failures arrive grouped, flaky separated from real, the change that broke it named.
terminal · test outputFAILED test_checkout_saved_card · AssertionError: $47,900 != $48,200FAILED test_loyalty_discount · TimeoutException after 30sFAILED test_stage_totals · ElementNotInteractableExceptionFAILED test_contact_merge · StaleElementReferenceException…43 more failures47 failed, 132 passed · which reds are real? - 06Test maintenance
Today: The UI moved, your selectors are wrong, this is now your week.
In Test Studio: Locators survive the change and repairs show up as a diff you approve or reject.
Sprint 41 · boardTo do (9)Fix selector: checkout_spec.pyAlexUpdate locators after nav redesignAlexRe-record login flowPriyaInvestigate flaky cart testAlex↩ 6 of 9 carried over from Sprint 40
See it run on your application.
Watch ZeuZ Test Studio automate the entire release cycle, from test design to test maintenance. See how it returns ~40x on your AI spend.
Connect the AI test automation tool to the stack you already run.
GitHub, Jira, Notion, Google Drive and your CI/CD connect directly, so Test Studio authors from the context your team already owns.
Automated test case generation, execution, and maintenance.
This is how AI software testing runs in Test Studio: you describe it, you watch it gather evidence, you keep the test. The same conversation moves from a human instruction to live evidence to structured, reviewable automation.
Domain expert states the intent · Test Studio structures and runs · the automation engineer inspects the code · the QA lead owns the release evidence.
What you get in an AI testing tool built for QA work.
An AI testing tool earns its place by what survives after the prompt ends.
Your test data stays out of your test code.
QA automation tools break on environment differences; Test Studio binds them once as typed variables.
You didn't tell it the password was a secret. It worked that out. Sensitive values stay masked; allowed values can be scoped to people, nodes and tests.
AI QA automation versus a general coding assistant.
AI QA automation needs a test estate (a catalog, priorities, run history, variables, evidence); a general coding assistant has none of it. ZeuZ is not either/or: code from OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot or any other assistant is verified through the same six-step flow in ZeuZ Test Studio.
# assumes selectors you'll
# have to find yourself…
reuses 3 catalog steps · data bound
from Variables · run history attached
| Capability | General AI chat tool | ZeuZ Test Studio |
|---|---|---|
| See every test case | ✕ | ✓ |
| Prioritise what to test | ✕ | ✓ |
| Run history and flakiness | ✕ | ✓ |
| Test data and secrets | ✕ | ✓ |
| Reusable steps | ✕ | ✓ |
| Suites and regression packs | ✕ | ✓ |
| Schedules and CI triggers | ✕ | ✓ |
| Evidence for a failure | ✕ | ✓ |
Questions about AI test automation.
Ready to automate QA testing today?
See ZeuZ Test Studio write, run and repair tests against your own application code.
or explore our services →